Turks are Turks (published in the Turkish Daily News http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=76629 )
'Biz bize benzeriz,' Ataturk used to say. 'We are like ourselves.'
It is a mistake, I believe, to say Turkey is European, or Asian, or Middle Eastern.
Its geography includes all of these. But its culture can only be called Turkish.
The political system is like West Europe, the military and police seem more East European, and the main religion is from the Middle East.
The language is from Central Asia but is now written with the Roman alphabet. The food is a combination of Central Asia and the Mediterranean.
The people and their culture are a mix of all the above places. Anatolia seems close to Asia. Istanbul and the Agaen coast seem closer to the Balkan countries and Greece.
I have read that the Ottomans always wanted more people in their empire. Race was not important, and as early as the time of Fatih Mehmet the Turks were a minority in their own empire.
The result is a culture that can only be called Turkish.
Perhaps the most unusual part of this is the language. It is the main connection with the origins of the Turks who first came here.
It is a close relative of other languages in Central Asia, and a more distant relative of East Asian languages such as Mongolian, Korean and Japanese.
Some experts say there is a connection between the Turks and the native Americans. DNA testing has supported this idea.
The popular theory is that native Americans came from East Asia toward the end of the last Ice Age, when much lower sea levels created a land bridge between Siberia and Alaska.
Hugh Pope, a journalist in Istanbul, writes in his book 'Sons of the Conquerers' that a Turkish friend of his in America has found 500 Turkic words in Navaho Indian and 500 more in Mexican Maya.
The Turks of Central Asia could even be more closely related to some native American peoples than they are to the majority of people in Turkey.
It is very interesting that the Turkish language survived the journey across Asia when many other things changed.
It also survived the rise and fall of an empire that in the time of Kanuni Suleyman was the biggest in the world, ruling much of the Middle East, North Africa and South East Europe.
Turkey is a bridge in many ways. But it is also the home of a unique, fascinating and important culture that has given a lot to the world around it, and which can only be described as Turkish.
end
Monday, June 18, 2007
Wednesday, May 23, 2007
Polynesians in Africa? Vikings in America?
Polynesians in Africa? Vikings in America? Caucasians in Japan?
These are some of the historical oddities I have been researching on the internet:
"Polynesians" in Africa:
The prevalented theory is the first inhabitants of Madagascar were a Malayo-Polynesian speaking people of Austronesian, or mixed Austronesian-Negroid, ethnicity.
They are thought to have reached the giant African island in Biblical times, or shortly after, about when their ethnic kinsmen were travelling from Samoa and Tonga toward Tahiti.
Austroloid peoples originated in South East Asia and had been expanding into Australia and the Pacific since the Stone Age. They progressed as far as Fiji in the east. The Melanesian (black lands) are the islands inhabited by their descendants.
It seems there was a fresh wave of mixed Mongoloid-Austroloid migrations, beginning just a few thousand years ago, most probably as Mongoloid began to press down from North East Asia.
The migrations throughout the Pacific, as far as Hawaii, Tahiti, Easter Island and New Zealand are well-documented. It seems they may also have reached South America, without actually settling there, as South American crops featured in Pan-Polynesian trade routes of pre-European times.
Polynesia simply means 'many lands' and is the name given to the Austroloid-Mongoloid race which inhabited these islands.
Austroloid-Mongoloid also migrated west, along the southern coast of Asia and the east coast of Africa. Whether or not they mixed with African natives before their arrival in Madagascar remains a mystery. It is known that the Arabs introduced native Africans to the island after they began trading there in the seventh century AD.
Europeans did not discover Madagascar until eight years after Colombus had reached the Americas.
Diogo Dias of Portugal became the first Euorpean to sight the island in 1500. The French began trading there in the 17th century, then invaded in 1883, establishing a protectorate two years later.
The majority of the population remains of mixed Austronesian-Negroid ethnicity. The national language, Malagasy, is a member of the Malayo-Polynesian family. A caste system is active among the 18 ancient tribes of the island. The Merina are the largest among them.
In the early 19th century Andrianampoinimerinandriantsimitoviaminandriampanjaka united the Merina kingdom, a collection of Malayo-Austronesian speaking tribes in the highlands (they number about 3 million today). He went on to conquer most of the island. His successor Radama I signed a treaty with the British, outlawed slavery and admitted Christian missionaries.
He was followed by his widow, Queen Ranavalona I, who secured her place via the practice of fratricide, and ruled for 33 years. She prohibited Christianity, banished the missionaries, and engaged in a campaign of religious persecution leading to as many as 150,000 Christian deaths.
Ranavalona's heir, Radama II (son of Radama I), in turn, reversed many of her policies, signing treaties with the English and French and welcoming back the missionaries. He was assassinated in 1863, after just two years on the throne.
Queens Ranavalona II and III followed, before French victory brought an end to the Merina dynasty in 1897.
Madagascar did not regain full independence until 1960, 13 years after an unsuccessful uprising which claimed as many as 90,000 lives, all but 180 of them Malagasy. Thousands more had been sentenced to death or imprisonment.
"Vikings" were the first Europeans in America:
Although this became an established fact following the discovery of Norse ruins in Newfoundland in 1960, it is still not widely known that Europeans had reached the Americas half a millenia before Columbus, who arrived there half a millenia ago.
Leif Ericson, son of Eric the Red (a Norwegian outlaw banished to Iceland, from whence he discovered Greenland in the early 980s), sailed from Greenland around 1000AD in search of a land sighted by countryman Bjarni Herjolfsson when blown off course during a storm in 986.
Ericson first reached Baffin Island (Canada), which he named Helluland (land of the flat stones), then Markland (forest land), generally considered to have been Labrador.
The first "permanent" settlement was at the northern tip of New Foundland, which Ericson named Vinland (wine land). The ruins were uncovered by Helge Ingstad and Anne Stine in the 1950s, finally confirmed in 1960.
The colonization was not led by Ericson, however, but by his brother-in-law Thorfinn Karlsefni some years later. According to the Icelandic sagas, Karlsefni took 160 people with him, all but 15 of them men.
They survived there only a few years. Their demise remains a mystery. It may have come about as a result of conflict with the natives, though the sagas recount efforts on the part of the settlers to appease the local chiefs.
A Viking coin has been discovered in Maine, and a Scandanavian stone carving in Minnesota, but there is no concrete evidence the Norsemen ventured as far south as the modern-day United States. More likely these artefacts arrived there through trade, whether in pre-Columbıan times or later.
"Caucasians" in Japan?
Although I have, in the past, read accounts which describe the Ainu aboriginals of Japan as "Caucasoid," it now seems that theory has fallen by the wayside.
Genetic testing has shown the Ainu to be a Mongoloid people whose closest relatives are in Tibet and the Bengal Bay islands of Andaman. Neither were they the original inhabitants of Japan. Tribes of various ethnicity had been making their way into the islands since the Stone Age.
It seems the Ainu were one of a number of tribes which existed on the continent before the rise of the Chinese Han dynasty.
Attempts have been made to include the Ainu language in the macro-Altaic, which includes Japanese, Korean, Mongolian and Turkic. However, it is commonly accepted to be a "language isolate."
Slightly more far-fetched hypotheses endeavoured to link Ainu with Austronesian, and even the hypothetical macro-Euroasiatic language. The latter perhaps gave rise to the "Caucasoid" theory.
Taller and more athletic than the Japanese, people of predominantly Ainu stock number around 50,000 today. There are a further 100,000 Japanese with minor Ainu ancestry.
end
These are some of the historical oddities I have been researching on the internet:
"Polynesians" in Africa:
The prevalented theory is the first inhabitants of Madagascar were a Malayo-Polynesian speaking people of Austronesian, or mixed Austronesian-Negroid, ethnicity.
They are thought to have reached the giant African island in Biblical times, or shortly after, about when their ethnic kinsmen were travelling from Samoa and Tonga toward Tahiti.
Austroloid peoples originated in South East Asia and had been expanding into Australia and the Pacific since the Stone Age. They progressed as far as Fiji in the east. The Melanesian (black lands) are the islands inhabited by their descendants.
It seems there was a fresh wave of mixed Mongoloid-Austroloid migrations, beginning just a few thousand years ago, most probably as Mongoloid began to press down from North East Asia.
The migrations throughout the Pacific, as far as Hawaii, Tahiti, Easter Island and New Zealand are well-documented. It seems they may also have reached South America, without actually settling there, as South American crops featured in Pan-Polynesian trade routes of pre-European times.
Polynesia simply means 'many lands' and is the name given to the Austroloid-Mongoloid race which inhabited these islands.
Austroloid-Mongoloid also migrated west, along the southern coast of Asia and the east coast of Africa. Whether or not they mixed with African natives before their arrival in Madagascar remains a mystery. It is known that the Arabs introduced native Africans to the island after they began trading there in the seventh century AD.
Europeans did not discover Madagascar until eight years after Colombus had reached the Americas.
Diogo Dias of Portugal became the first Euorpean to sight the island in 1500. The French began trading there in the 17th century, then invaded in 1883, establishing a protectorate two years later.
The majority of the population remains of mixed Austronesian-Negroid ethnicity. The national language, Malagasy, is a member of the Malayo-Polynesian family. A caste system is active among the 18 ancient tribes of the island. The Merina are the largest among them.
In the early 19th century Andrianampoinimerinandriantsimitoviaminandriampanjaka united the Merina kingdom, a collection of Malayo-Austronesian speaking tribes in the highlands (they number about 3 million today). He went on to conquer most of the island. His successor Radama I signed a treaty with the British, outlawed slavery and admitted Christian missionaries.
He was followed by his widow, Queen Ranavalona I, who secured her place via the practice of fratricide, and ruled for 33 years. She prohibited Christianity, banished the missionaries, and engaged in a campaign of religious persecution leading to as many as 150,000 Christian deaths.
Ranavalona's heir, Radama II (son of Radama I), in turn, reversed many of her policies, signing treaties with the English and French and welcoming back the missionaries. He was assassinated in 1863, after just two years on the throne.
Queens Ranavalona II and III followed, before French victory brought an end to the Merina dynasty in 1897.
Madagascar did not regain full independence until 1960, 13 years after an unsuccessful uprising which claimed as many as 90,000 lives, all but 180 of them Malagasy. Thousands more had been sentenced to death or imprisonment.
"Vikings" were the first Europeans in America:
Although this became an established fact following the discovery of Norse ruins in Newfoundland in 1960, it is still not widely known that Europeans had reached the Americas half a millenia before Columbus, who arrived there half a millenia ago.
Leif Ericson, son of Eric the Red (a Norwegian outlaw banished to Iceland, from whence he discovered Greenland in the early 980s), sailed from Greenland around 1000AD in search of a land sighted by countryman Bjarni Herjolfsson when blown off course during a storm in 986.
Ericson first reached Baffin Island (Canada), which he named Helluland (land of the flat stones), then Markland (forest land), generally considered to have been Labrador.
The first "permanent" settlement was at the northern tip of New Foundland, which Ericson named Vinland (wine land). The ruins were uncovered by Helge Ingstad and Anne Stine in the 1950s, finally confirmed in 1960.
The colonization was not led by Ericson, however, but by his brother-in-law Thorfinn Karlsefni some years later. According to the Icelandic sagas, Karlsefni took 160 people with him, all but 15 of them men.
They survived there only a few years. Their demise remains a mystery. It may have come about as a result of conflict with the natives, though the sagas recount efforts on the part of the settlers to appease the local chiefs.
A Viking coin has been discovered in Maine, and a Scandanavian stone carving in Minnesota, but there is no concrete evidence the Norsemen ventured as far south as the modern-day United States. More likely these artefacts arrived there through trade, whether in pre-Columbıan times or later.
"Caucasians" in Japan?
Although I have, in the past, read accounts which describe the Ainu aboriginals of Japan as "Caucasoid," it now seems that theory has fallen by the wayside.
Genetic testing has shown the Ainu to be a Mongoloid people whose closest relatives are in Tibet and the Bengal Bay islands of Andaman. Neither were they the original inhabitants of Japan. Tribes of various ethnicity had been making their way into the islands since the Stone Age.
It seems the Ainu were one of a number of tribes which existed on the continent before the rise of the Chinese Han dynasty.
Attempts have been made to include the Ainu language in the macro-Altaic, which includes Japanese, Korean, Mongolian and Turkic. However, it is commonly accepted to be a "language isolate."
Slightly more far-fetched hypotheses endeavoured to link Ainu with Austronesian, and even the hypothetical macro-Euroasiatic language. The latter perhaps gave rise to the "Caucasoid" theory.
Taller and more athletic than the Japanese, people of predominantly Ainu stock number around 50,000 today. There are a further 100,000 Japanese with minor Ainu ancestry.
end
Monday, May 14, 2007
Trials & Tribulations of a native English-speaker
(published in the Turkish Daily News http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=74440 )
Native English speakers, they like to say, are not good at learning other languages.
In my case that certainly holds true.
I am handicapped, as a New Zealander, having grown up in a society where no other language was used.
Eight years ago I set off for Europe in search of adventure. One of the challenges I set for myself was to learn another language. I settled in Spain and spent the next five years learning Spanish.
The first year I was based in Jaen, central Andalusia. This provided an invaluable crash course, for English-speakers were few and far between.
The next year, spent in the Basque capital Vitoria, was similarly beneficial.
Then I moved to Barcelona, a veritable paradise on the Mediterranean. But like much of that sun-drenched coast, it is infested with English-speaking foreigners, not least the English themselves.
Among the locals, and even the immigrants from non-English-speaking countries, I stood more chance of having a discussion in Catalan than I did in Spanish.
When I spoke to people in Spanish they would invariably reply in English. If I insisted on Spanish they would raise the bar to a level above my comprehension, then smugly come to my aid in English.
My companion during these times, a blond Catalan, was regularly addressed in English by her own countrymen - in the heart of Barcelona, much to her annoyance
I have encountered similar difficulties since coming to Turkey. Perhaps due to the Turkish language's lack of international usage, the prevalent attitude seems to be that a foreigner attempting to speak it is clearly showing off. The raising-the-bar tactic is thus executed with particular relish.
Yet the Turks, like the Spanish, crave nothing more than an opportunity to practise their English with a native-speaker; a joy which surpasses even that of deriding the native English-speaker's lack of linguistic aptitude.
All this is, of course, a result of English-speaking America's domination of the world. A thousand years ago I might have encountered similar difficulties striking up a conversation in anything but Latin. Five centuries ago it might have been Spanish. Two hundred and fifty years ago, French.
While American domination of the world is encouraging its inhabitants to embrace English as the lingua franca of our times, it is simultaneously encouraging much animosity toward America.
I would be the first to endorse widespread grievances over the manner in which American domination of the world is being sustained. But a tallish, broad-shouldered redhead - the embodiment of the stereotypical 'Frankish' oppressor, I suppose - I tend to find myself a prime target for those with the chip-on-the-shoulder mentality.
But, if anything, resentment of my efforts to speak other languages seems even more proncounced among English-speakers themselves. For it is unnecessary in a world where everyone is learning English.
Clearly I have spent the past seven years struggling to learn other languages just to show off.
Had I not made that effort, however, I would have been perceived as the arrogant foreigner who expected everyone to speakEnglish; the embodiment of the stereotypical English-speaker incapable of learning another language.
end
Native English speakers, they like to say, are not good at learning other languages.
In my case that certainly holds true.
I am handicapped, as a New Zealander, having grown up in a society where no other language was used.
Eight years ago I set off for Europe in search of adventure. One of the challenges I set for myself was to learn another language. I settled in Spain and spent the next five years learning Spanish.
The first year I was based in Jaen, central Andalusia. This provided an invaluable crash course, for English-speakers were few and far between.
The next year, spent in the Basque capital Vitoria, was similarly beneficial.
Then I moved to Barcelona, a veritable paradise on the Mediterranean. But like much of that sun-drenched coast, it is infested with English-speaking foreigners, not least the English themselves.
Among the locals, and even the immigrants from non-English-speaking countries, I stood more chance of having a discussion in Catalan than I did in Spanish.
When I spoke to people in Spanish they would invariably reply in English. If I insisted on Spanish they would raise the bar to a level above my comprehension, then smugly come to my aid in English.
My companion during these times, a blond Catalan, was regularly addressed in English by her own countrymen - in the heart of Barcelona, much to her annoyance
I have encountered similar difficulties since coming to Turkey. Perhaps due to the Turkish language's lack of international usage, the prevalent attitude seems to be that a foreigner attempting to speak it is clearly showing off. The raising-the-bar tactic is thus executed with particular relish.
Yet the Turks, like the Spanish, crave nothing more than an opportunity to practise their English with a native-speaker; a joy which surpasses even that of deriding the native English-speaker's lack of linguistic aptitude.
All this is, of course, a result of English-speaking America's domination of the world. A thousand years ago I might have encountered similar difficulties striking up a conversation in anything but Latin. Five centuries ago it might have been Spanish. Two hundred and fifty years ago, French.
While American domination of the world is encouraging its inhabitants to embrace English as the lingua franca of our times, it is simultaneously encouraging much animosity toward America.
I would be the first to endorse widespread grievances over the manner in which American domination of the world is being sustained. But a tallish, broad-shouldered redhead - the embodiment of the stereotypical 'Frankish' oppressor, I suppose - I tend to find myself a prime target for those with the chip-on-the-shoulder mentality.
But, if anything, resentment of my efforts to speak other languages seems even more proncounced among English-speakers themselves. For it is unnecessary in a world where everyone is learning English.
Clearly I have spent the past seven years struggling to learn other languages just to show off.
Had I not made that effort, however, I would have been perceived as the arrogant foreigner who expected everyone to speakEnglish; the embodiment of the stereotypical English-speaker incapable of learning another language.
end
Wednesday, April 11, 2007
Founding US Football in NZ
Twenty years ago I set up the first American football team in my home city Wellington, New Zealand.
I was 23-years-old then and knew nothing about the game. But I wanted to play it.
I advertised for players in the local paper and waited until I got someone capable of coaching before I brought everyone together.
We got between a dozen and two dozen players along to our Sunday afternoon practise sessions. This was in the summer, as most of us were winter-time rugby players. The coach seldom made it along, however.
National league basketball coach Jeff Green challenged us to a game against his crowd in the suburb of Wainuiomata. They included some members of his basketball team, among them two or three American imports. We lost 8-2 in a game played without equipment.
They visited us at our Rongotai College base a month later and again we lost.
The following season we moved to Porirua Hospital, where we were offered use of a rugby pitch with, oddly, Y-shaped goal posts such as those used in the American game. We played Jeff's team three times that summer, losing away then winning twice at home.
At the end of the season we set up a committee, became an incorporated society, and named our team the Harbour City Hurricanes.
We were still just a bunch of guys in T-shirts and track pants, without a real coach.
It was during our third season that we began to obtain some equipment. This was largely due to a loan from player and committee member Ken Turner. We also acquired a couple of non-playing expat North American coaches. Jeff's team were no more, so we turned our eyes to Auckland, the nation's biggest city, where a league was well-established with about 10 teams.
We made the 400 mile (650km) journey north in January 1990 for our first 'real' game of American football. We hired a mini-bus for the purpose, which broke down just short of our destination, and were billeted by the local team.
The Manukau Stallions had finished last in the Auckland league. They beat us 26-0.
We had precisely 11 helmets, so the players had to exchange them as they came on and off the field. About half the players had shoulder pads. I personally played linebacker and was totally confounded by the blockers, a concept I had not encountered before.
The Stallions visited us a month later and won 8-0 with a touchdown and a safety. This game was attended by Horst Maczuga, education officer at Porirua Police College, who had coached high school football in his native Ohio. He joined our committee and was appointed head-coach for the following season.
During the off-season I busied myself setting up Wellington's second team, the Hutt Valley Chargers, which included a few veterans of Jeff's old crowd. This resulted in some heated arguments between Horst and myself. I had already lost the confidence of some members of the committee due to the club's financial problems. These had resulted from an embezzlement of club funds by the original treasurer; something I had personally failed to detect. Needless to say, Ken's loan had yet to be repaid.
Horst's hand was greatly strengthened when, acting independently of the committee, he managed to secure funding sufficient to clear all debts and fit the entire squad out with equipment and new uniforms. It was indeed a giant leap forward for American football in Wellington.
I left the Hurricanes three years after setting them up and devoted myself to the Chargers. This time things fell into place a lot quicker. We got a big squad together in the spring of 1990, including non-playing coaches. Following Horst's lead, I managed to arrange pub charity funding to kit 22 players out. We played the Hurricanes at the end of the season, for a Capital Bowl trophy which I personally presented for competition, and were defeated 20-16. We also hosted Auckland's Bulldogs, losing 8-6. The Hurricanes, meanwhile, had hosted a team from the city of Hamilton (who played in the Auckland league), losing narrowly, then visited Auckland to take on the third-placed Rangers - who trounced them 97-0!
At the end of the season I set up a Chargers committee. Murray Sullivan, father of our quarterback, was elected president. I wished only to serve in the capacity of publicity officer, as I already had my sights set on establishing a third team. The Chargers did not elect me, however, uncomfortable with my intentions.
The new team would be established in urban Wellington and be known as the Capital City Giants. The Hurricanes had started there but moved east to Porirua. I obtained pub charity funding for the equipment and found a home base at the Teachers Training College in the suburb of Karori.
I then approached the Hurricanes and Chargers about setting up a league and a regional organisation. Surprisingly this met with resistance. The Chargers were for a league but against a regional organisation. The Hurricanes opposed both ideas, but eventually came around to the idea of a league.
All games were played at a venue in the Hutt Valley, which suited the Giants, as our training pitch was barely half-size. We caused a shock in our opening game by defeating the Hurricanes. Next up we tied the Chargers 26-26. It went downhill from there and we lost the rest of our games. Difficult to say why, but the Giants were not a harmonious bunch during my season in charge. There was a clash of personalities within the coaching staff, and a certain amount of immaturity among the players, I felt.
Something else I had organised during the off-season was a visit by a small college team from Nebraska, the Doane Tigers. This was a major undertaking, given our scant resources, and only made possible by further assistance from our pub charity sponsor. The Hurricanes and Chargers had declined to assist us.
Arriving in January 1992, the Tigers blitzed a Wellington Capitals team 82-6 in front of 1000 paying spectators at the Hutt Recreation Ground. The Capitals comprised the best players from our three teams, and included two guests: international rugby star Simon Mannix as kicker/punter, and former Utah State runningback Timo Tagaloa - who bolted half the length of the field for the home-side's only score. Jeff Green came on board as head coach.
A week later the Tigers played the Giants at the same venue, running out 89-0 winners in front of just a few hundred paying spectators. Curiously the Giants' jerseys disappeared on the morning of this game. Murray Sullivan came to the rescue with his Chargers' jerseys. Some of these were not returned by my players and team funds had to be used to replace them.
In another unsavoury incident that summer I was personally attacked by a Chargers lineman while helping umpire a game between the Hutt Valley and the Hurricanes. The assailant was forced to sit out the final, but no further action was taken against him.
By this time a new team was being organised in the town of Levin, some 60 miles (100km) north of Wellington. The individual who attacked me was one of a number of players who left the Chargers to join the new team.
Meetings were being held between delegates of the clubs on a regular basis. However, there was no league committee proper and the Levin delegation argued fiercely in defence of their player when the subject of the attack was raised.
The final, Capital Bowl II, was won by the Chargers, 12-6, over a much-improved Hurricanes.
At the end of the season I set up a Giants committee, then left the club to its own devices. I was not involved in the competition the following season, as I had accepted an invitation to go and train with the Tigers at Doane College (where I was also permitted to study literature, social-psychology and journalism and extend my stay the next year).
The Levin Tigers entered the league in my absence and won the competition in their debut season. They beat the Giants 21-7 in Capital Bowl III, Fijian rugby star Philip Reyasi running in three touchdowns.
A journalist by profession, I resumed writing newspaper articles on the league when I returned from Nebraska. But my services were not welcome at administrative level, apparently, which left me with no appetite for coaching, despite being approached by the Chargers. At 30 years of age, I had also decided to give up playing.
Doane College made a second visit to New Zealand in 1996, blitzing the Hurricanes 93-0 and defeating the Wellington representative team 42-6. By this time a regional committee was in place, and an annual inter-city encounter between Auckland and Wellington was underway, the former winning the first such clash, 17-10, at Wellington's biggest sports venue, Athletic Park.
I continued to write game reports for the newspapers right up until my departure from New Zealand in 1999. I have been teaching English in Europe since. From the internet I am able to ascertain that there are four teams in Wellington today, and that they continue to contest the Capital Bowl, which has been named in honour of Horst Maczuga - first commissioner of the regional committee and head coach of the Wellington team which upset Auckland 10-0 in 1999. A five-team high school league is also in place http://www.leaguelineup.com/welcome.asp?url=afsc .
I was 23-years-old then and knew nothing about the game. But I wanted to play it.
I advertised for players in the local paper and waited until I got someone capable of coaching before I brought everyone together.
We got between a dozen and two dozen players along to our Sunday afternoon practise sessions. This was in the summer, as most of us were winter-time rugby players. The coach seldom made it along, however.
National league basketball coach Jeff Green challenged us to a game against his crowd in the suburb of Wainuiomata. They included some members of his basketball team, among them two or three American imports. We lost 8-2 in a game played without equipment.
They visited us at our Rongotai College base a month later and again we lost.
The following season we moved to Porirua Hospital, where we were offered use of a rugby pitch with, oddly, Y-shaped goal posts such as those used in the American game. We played Jeff's team three times that summer, losing away then winning twice at home.
At the end of the season we set up a committee, became an incorporated society, and named our team the Harbour City Hurricanes.
We were still just a bunch of guys in T-shirts and track pants, without a real coach.
It was during our third season that we began to obtain some equipment. This was largely due to a loan from player and committee member Ken Turner. We also acquired a couple of non-playing expat North American coaches. Jeff's team were no more, so we turned our eyes to Auckland, the nation's biggest city, where a league was well-established with about 10 teams.
We made the 400 mile (650km) journey north in January 1990 for our first 'real' game of American football. We hired a mini-bus for the purpose, which broke down just short of our destination, and were billeted by the local team.
The Manukau Stallions had finished last in the Auckland league. They beat us 26-0.
We had precisely 11 helmets, so the players had to exchange them as they came on and off the field. About half the players had shoulder pads. I personally played linebacker and was totally confounded by the blockers, a concept I had not encountered before.
The Stallions visited us a month later and won 8-0 with a touchdown and a safety. This game was attended by Horst Maczuga, education officer at Porirua Police College, who had coached high school football in his native Ohio. He joined our committee and was appointed head-coach for the following season.
During the off-season I busied myself setting up Wellington's second team, the Hutt Valley Chargers, which included a few veterans of Jeff's old crowd. This resulted in some heated arguments between Horst and myself. I had already lost the confidence of some members of the committee due to the club's financial problems. These had resulted from an embezzlement of club funds by the original treasurer; something I had personally failed to detect. Needless to say, Ken's loan had yet to be repaid.
Horst's hand was greatly strengthened when, acting independently of the committee, he managed to secure funding sufficient to clear all debts and fit the entire squad out with equipment and new uniforms. It was indeed a giant leap forward for American football in Wellington.
I left the Hurricanes three years after setting them up and devoted myself to the Chargers. This time things fell into place a lot quicker. We got a big squad together in the spring of 1990, including non-playing coaches. Following Horst's lead, I managed to arrange pub charity funding to kit 22 players out. We played the Hurricanes at the end of the season, for a Capital Bowl trophy which I personally presented for competition, and were defeated 20-16. We also hosted Auckland's Bulldogs, losing 8-6. The Hurricanes, meanwhile, had hosted a team from the city of Hamilton (who played in the Auckland league), losing narrowly, then visited Auckland to take on the third-placed Rangers - who trounced them 97-0!
At the end of the season I set up a Chargers committee. Murray Sullivan, father of our quarterback, was elected president. I wished only to serve in the capacity of publicity officer, as I already had my sights set on establishing a third team. The Chargers did not elect me, however, uncomfortable with my intentions.
The new team would be established in urban Wellington and be known as the Capital City Giants. The Hurricanes had started there but moved east to Porirua. I obtained pub charity funding for the equipment and found a home base at the Teachers Training College in the suburb of Karori.
I then approached the Hurricanes and Chargers about setting up a league and a regional organisation. Surprisingly this met with resistance. The Chargers were for a league but against a regional organisation. The Hurricanes opposed both ideas, but eventually came around to the idea of a league.
All games were played at a venue in the Hutt Valley, which suited the Giants, as our training pitch was barely half-size. We caused a shock in our opening game by defeating the Hurricanes. Next up we tied the Chargers 26-26. It went downhill from there and we lost the rest of our games. Difficult to say why, but the Giants were not a harmonious bunch during my season in charge. There was a clash of personalities within the coaching staff, and a certain amount of immaturity among the players, I felt.
Something else I had organised during the off-season was a visit by a small college team from Nebraska, the Doane Tigers. This was a major undertaking, given our scant resources, and only made possible by further assistance from our pub charity sponsor. The Hurricanes and Chargers had declined to assist us.
Arriving in January 1992, the Tigers blitzed a Wellington Capitals team 82-6 in front of 1000 paying spectators at the Hutt Recreation Ground. The Capitals comprised the best players from our three teams, and included two guests: international rugby star Simon Mannix as kicker/punter, and former Utah State runningback Timo Tagaloa - who bolted half the length of the field for the home-side's only score. Jeff Green came on board as head coach.
A week later the Tigers played the Giants at the same venue, running out 89-0 winners in front of just a few hundred paying spectators. Curiously the Giants' jerseys disappeared on the morning of this game. Murray Sullivan came to the rescue with his Chargers' jerseys. Some of these were not returned by my players and team funds had to be used to replace them.
In another unsavoury incident that summer I was personally attacked by a Chargers lineman while helping umpire a game between the Hutt Valley and the Hurricanes. The assailant was forced to sit out the final, but no further action was taken against him.
By this time a new team was being organised in the town of Levin, some 60 miles (100km) north of Wellington. The individual who attacked me was one of a number of players who left the Chargers to join the new team.
Meetings were being held between delegates of the clubs on a regular basis. However, there was no league committee proper and the Levin delegation argued fiercely in defence of their player when the subject of the attack was raised.
The final, Capital Bowl II, was won by the Chargers, 12-6, over a much-improved Hurricanes.
At the end of the season I set up a Giants committee, then left the club to its own devices. I was not involved in the competition the following season, as I had accepted an invitation to go and train with the Tigers at Doane College (where I was also permitted to study literature, social-psychology and journalism and extend my stay the next year).
The Levin Tigers entered the league in my absence and won the competition in their debut season. They beat the Giants 21-7 in Capital Bowl III, Fijian rugby star Philip Reyasi running in three touchdowns.
A journalist by profession, I resumed writing newspaper articles on the league when I returned from Nebraska. But my services were not welcome at administrative level, apparently, which left me with no appetite for coaching, despite being approached by the Chargers. At 30 years of age, I had also decided to give up playing.
Doane College made a second visit to New Zealand in 1996, blitzing the Hurricanes 93-0 and defeating the Wellington representative team 42-6. By this time a regional committee was in place, and an annual inter-city encounter between Auckland and Wellington was underway, the former winning the first such clash, 17-10, at Wellington's biggest sports venue, Athletic Park.
I continued to write game reports for the newspapers right up until my departure from New Zealand in 1999. I have been teaching English in Europe since. From the internet I am able to ascertain that there are four teams in Wellington today, and that they continue to contest the Capital Bowl, which has been named in honour of Horst Maczuga - first commissioner of the regional committee and head coach of the Wellington team which upset Auckland 10-0 in 1999. A five-team high school league is also in place http://www.leaguelineup.com/welcome.asp?url=afsc .
Friday, February 23, 2007
Kurdish history
Part 1 (Whereas my other histories on this site are based on the writings of a wide variety of experts, this is based primarily on the contents of one particular volume, A Modern History of the Kurds by David McDowal which, it is worth bearing in mind, is freely available in Istanbul shops).
The Kurdish people are ethnically and linguistically akin to Iranians. They number between 24 and 27 million worldwide, with about half in Turkey, a quarter in Iran and a sixth in Iraq - the majority living in the mountainous regions around the common border of these three nations, the ethnographic 'Kurdistan.' A further one million are in Syria, many of them having migrated down from Anatolia.
Three quarters of Kurds are Sunni Muslims. The remainder, mostly in central Anatolia, are Alevi, a branch of the Shi'ite faith with influences from the Zoroastrian and Turkic Shaman religions dating back 3,500 years. Many belong to Sufi mystic brotherhoods, another pre-Islamic tie.
Their languages form a branch of the Indo-European Farsi family, but differ from one another in some cases as much as English and German do. Turkic and Arabic influences are evident, and there are also many distinct 'Kurdish' words. Some Kurdish dialects have more in common with Farsi than they do with other Kurdish dialects.
The Kurds are considered to have originated in and around Iran. Waves of these Indo-European tribes began migrating westward in the Second Million BC. Indo-Europeans linguistically; ethnically, like most peoples of Southern Asia, a hybrid of Australoid (who originated in South East Asia) and Caucasoid (who originated in Southern Russia).
Kurdish tribes, in fact, were on the receiving end of attacks from Sumer (Iraq) over 4,000 years ago. But little is really known of their history until the advent of Islam in the seventh century. The ninth century found them fighting alongside the (doomed) Sassanians of Persia, and they were soon absorbed into the Islamic Empire.
They frequently rebelled against their Arab rulers however, and in 866 actually captured the city of Mosul. At the same time, Kurds remained prominent in the Arab campaigns against Christian Byzantium, Armenia and the Crusades. Though they often grated with the Turkmen alongside whom they fought, they produced similarly fine officers, notably the great Saladin al-Din of Tikrit (Northern Iraq). Saladin routed the Crusades in the 12th century and founded the Ayyubid Dynasty which spanned Egypt, Syria, Yemen, Iraq, Mecca and Diyarbakir (southern Turkey).
Saladin's rise coincided with the beginning of Arabic demise, and the Kurds now found themselves on the receiving end of Mongol and Turkish Seljuk raids, especially in Anatolia - where the entire population of Diyarbakir (Kurdistan's biggest city) was wiped out by one Mongol rampage.
Diyarbakir and other Kurdish settlements were sacked again by Tamerlane the Tartar in the 14th century, and there were further invasions in the 15th century. These edited highlights give a distorted overall picture, however. For the most part, Kurds were able to live a peaceful, pastoral existence.
A major turning point came early in the 16th century when the Ottoman Empire, approaching its zenith, defeated the Persian Safavids at the Battle of Chaldiran. Subsequent Alevi uprisings were put down by the Turks, in one instance leaving 40,000 dead. The Ottomans followed up with the capture of Tabriz.
This left Kurdistan as a virtual 'no-man's land' between the two empires. Henceforth, the Kurds were to come increasingly under the influence of the Turks. Many chose to defect to the Ottoman Empire of their own accord. Suleyman the Magnificent proceeded to take further Kurdish-occupied areas from the Persians, with 40,000 Kurdish fighters assisting in the capture of Baghdad in 1638. (On the other side of the border, the Kurdish Ardalan tribe were fighting for the Shah...).
The Baban Kurds, meanwhile, found themselves fighting on both sides in the Ottoman-Persian wars of the late eighteenth century. They were not mere tools of the empire, but proved well adept at playing the two off against each other.
At the beginning of the 19th century, Kurdistan itself had become the cause of conflict between the Sultan and the Shah. By then a new power had joined the fray; Russia with its designs on the Ottoman Empire, now in decline. Many Kurds joined the ranks of the Russians. Nomadic Kurdish bandits, meanwhile, had become the bane of Anatolia.
In the 1830s Mir Muhammad of Rawanduz ruthlessly hacked out a Kurdish Empire in Iraq and began to threaten Ottoman interests. The Turks, preoccupied with the Egyptian challenge on Syria, sought to appease him, even offering to make him Pasha of all Kurdistan. But Mir Muhammad marched right up the Tigris to the Anatolian frontier, at which point he was only forced to withdraw in order to quell a rebellion within his own domains. The Ottomans pursued him and he finally submitted in 1834, having been assured safe passage to Istanbul (he later disappeared without a trace).
The Egyptians, meanwhile, had routed the Ottomans, allowing the Kurdish tribe of Bader Khan of Buhtan to fill the void. After failing in his campaign against the Assyrians, he turned on the Nestorian Christians, committing two massacres. The initial Ottoman attack in response was repelled, but they returned two years later with a larger force and forced Bader Khan to surrender. He was exiled to the island of Crete.
The latter half of the century witnessed the rise of the Sufi Shaykhs within the Ottoman Empire. In 1880 Shaykh Ubaydallah of Nihri invaded Persia on behalf of the 'Kurdish Nation.' This began with a rebellion within Iran itself led by his son Abd al Qadir. The rebels advanced eastward with an army of 20,000, slaughtering 2,000 civilians at Miandoab and destroying some 2,000 villages along their way.
But before long most of the tribesmen in their ranks had returned to their homes, laden with booty, leaving a mere 1,500 to face the wrath of the Persian army, 12,000-strong. The Shaykh's remaining forces fled, many to be captured and killed. Ubaydallah was sent into exile and died in 1883.
The 19th century closed with the massacres of Armenian Christians throughout the Ottoman Empire, triggered by an aborted hostage-taking incident in Istanbul which had given Sultan Abd al Hamid a pretext to stoke fanaticism in order to secure his own status. The Hamidiya Cavalry, a regiment formed by the Sultan himself, were prominent among the Kurds who participated in the atrocities. Internationally the very word 'Kurd' had become synonymous with 'banditry.'
The Sultan's insistence on all-encompassing Ottoman nationality only strengthened the Kurdish quest for autonomy within the empire. In 1889 two Kurds were among the four founding members of the Committee for Union Progress (CUP), an organisation with similar objectives to the Young Turks.
The Kurdish duo were exiled to Tripoli in 1895 and escaped to Europe two years later. Abdallah Jadwat then wrote for Kurdistan, a European-based publication which also championed Armenian demands.
Meanwhile the Nihri, successors of Ubayd Allah, had formed an autonomous movement, also in exile, and a group of Kurdish youth instigated the Kurdish Hope Society, publishing the Rujd Kurd newspaper which enjoyed wide membership.
The Young Turk revolution in 1908, overthrowing Abd al Hamid, was cause for much celebration among the Kurdish community. Among other things, it brought an end to the age-old 'agha' system, which entailed village chiefs living as virtual princes within their domains, oppressing and exploiting their subjects at will.
However, some of the more extreme religious elements of Kurdish society, and withal the aghas themselves, were less pleased, and began to liaise with the Russians with a view to establishing an independent homeland for the Kurds in eastern Anatolia. The new Turkish government subsequently laid off the aghas, and a united Russian-Kurdish-Armenian front never did materialise.
During the First World War, Kurdistan became a battle ground. Russian-backed Armenians and Turkish-backed Kurds committed massacres against each another. Kurdish tribesmen were also enlisted to participate in the massacres of 1915, which some have termed the 'Armenian genocide.' Others, however, notably Alevi, offered shelter to the Armenian Christians.
The Kurds reward for assisting the Turkish army was, ironically, forced assimilation under the Young Turk government. This included a programme of dispersal, uprooting 700,000 Kurds from their villages, with as many as half of them perishing.
In all the depredations of war hit the Kurds particularly hard. Perhaps half a million died, many from cold and starvation, and this does not include the estimated 800,000 killed in battle.
The post-war Sykes-Picot Plot, a secret agreement between the governments of England and France (exposed by the Bolsheviks) involving the virtual partition of Turkey, threatened to leave Kurds scattered among a variety of European colonies. Kurdish designs on autonomy were therefore put on the backburner, as Islamic solidarity with the Turks became paramount.
The surprising Turkish victory led to the formation of the Turkish Republic within the borders we know today. The Kurds pushed their case at the Treaty of Luasanne (1923), but their pleas for autonomy fell on deaf ears.
Harsh reprisals followed a rebellion by Shaykh Said and his followers in 1924, including the repression of all forms of Kurdish nationalism. Between 1924 and 1938 all but one of the 18 military operations involving the Turkish army were carried out in Kurdistan. Kurdish sources claimed 200,000 died under 'deportation' from the region, with a further 15,000 villagers massacred.
In the late 20s the conflict moved to Mt Ararat, where the Kurds proclaimed a republic. This threatened to draw Turkey into war with Iran as the rebels sought refuge on the latter's side of the border. The Turks eventually drove the rebels off the mountain, with widespread executions in the aftermath.
Meanwhile in Iraq, Kurdish aims were scuppered by British, American and Turkish interest in the oil within the region. Sulaymaniya, in east Iraq, had gained a degree of self-rule under British rule. But their leader Shaykh Mahmud tried to seized full control and was sent into exile.
Pardoned and reinstated by the British in 1922, as a bulwark against the Turks, history repeated itself, as Mahmud again began to conspire against the colonial rulers. The British consequently bombed Sulaymaniya a number of times, forcing Mahmud to flee to the safety of the mountains. Riots followed in Sulaymaniya in 1930, leading to civilian deaths.
Indeed, at the signing of Iraqi independence in 1931, all promises to the Kurds in terms of political and cultural rights were forgotten. The League of Nations' acceptance of Iraq a year later was a further slap in the face of the Kurds.
The Barzan tribe, led by Shaykh Ahmad, proclaimed self-rule in 1932 and twice defeated the Iraqi forces. But the Iraqi's returned a third time, with the aid of British air support. The latter, using delayed action bombs in violation of the Hague Convention, caused widespread civilian carnage, and Ahmad was forced to surrender. His brothers continued the rebellion for another year, before surrendering under a generous amnesty.
A separate uprising on the part of the Khalil Khushawi Kurds, continued until 1936.
Back to Turkey where a Kurdish rebellion in the Anatolian province of Dersim had been quashed by aerial bombing in 1935. Casualties were estimated as high as 40,000 and comparisons were drawn to the treatment of Armenians two decades earlier. At that time Kurds accounted for 70% of East Anatolia's population.
In 1937 Turkey, Iraq and Iran signed a pact which reognised the established borders. No consideration was given to the Kurds.
In Iran as well there had been a series of post-World War I revolts, notably that of the Abdui Shikak. Backed by the Soviets, they remained the scourge of Iran until 1928, when the government betrayed and murdered their leader Simqu.
After the Second World War there was an uprising in Mahobad, also Soviet-backed. Following much turbulence, political scheming, inter-tribal conflict and warfare, this culminated in the formation of a tiny Kurdish Republic in 1945. Mahobad principal Qazi Muhammad, founder of the Kurdish Democratic Party of Iran, was declared president.
But when the Soviets withdrew from Iran just one year later, the republic was left vulnerable. Inevitably there were skirmishes, providing Tehran with a pretext to send in the troops. Qazi Muhammad and others, including his brother and his cousin, were publicly hanged.
Following the 1958 coup in Iraq by General Abd al Karim Qasim, a Kurdish rebellion broke out (Kurds actually fought on both sides, against Qasim and for him). When Qasim was on his way out, the Kurds allied themselves with the Baath Party, who overthrew him in 1963.
But the Kurds were betrayed in subsequent negotiations, with the oil-rich region of Kirkuk proving an insurmountable obstacle. The Iraq army imposed martial law in Sulaymaniya, with many deaths and disappearances resulting.
The Kurds had been weakened by a division within their own ranks. Mulla Mustafa's rebels had driven the Kurdish Democratic Party across the border into Iran. But he permitted them back again when war resumed with Baghdad in the mid-60s. Fifteen thousand Kurds held out against a hundred thousand Iraqis, before president Abdul Salam Arif's death in a plane crash brought a temporary pause to the conflict.
Arif's brother Abdul Rahman took over and resumed the war. But not even the use of napalm and chemical weapons by his airforce could bring him victory, and his army stumbled to defeat at the hands of the Kurdish Peshmergas, losing hundreds.
Iraq prime minister Abdul Rahman al-Bazzaz signed a treaty so generous to Kurdish interests, including a 'map to autonomy,' that he was driven out of office by Rahman and the army.
In the early 70s the Baaths, with a young Saddam Husayn prominent, again promised the Kurds autonomy, including full national rights, only for negotiations to again founder. The Baaths then attempted to assassinate Mulla Mustafa, sending human bombs.
Mustafa survived this and, emboldened by promises of US support, declined all Baath conditions, leading to outright war in the mid-70s. Iraq's army was twice the size of the Kurds', and backed up by tanks and aircraft. But Iran backed the Kurds with a view to overthrowing the Baaths. The ensuing stalemate led to a truce in March 1975. This signalled the end of Mustafa's involvement in the Kurdish struggle.
Meanwhile in Iran, the collapse of the Pahlavi regime in the late 70s, brought about a new push for Kurdish autonomy there. Tehran viewed this as 'secession,' all negotiations failed, and an estimated 10,000 deaths resulted from clashes during the first two years of the Khomeini reign.
A further 200 Kurds died in clashes with the Azaris when they attempted to stage a rally in Naqada in 1979.
The following year the Iranian army launched a major assault on Kurdish regions, subduing the locals, though at major cost to themselves.
At the outset of the Iran-Iraq War, Kurds seized lands within Iran. By 1983, however, Tehran had reclaimed it all and the rebels were driven across the border into Iraq.
As Iran gained the upper hand in the war with Iraq, Saddam Huseyn, unable to negotiate assistance from the Kurds, and fearful they would assist the enemy, executed 8,000 young men of the Barzani tribe. By 1986, Iraqi Kurds were fighting for Iran, and in 1987 they captured the Dukan Valley.
Further atrocities against Kurdish civilians ensued, including arbitrary executions and the razing of villages. Receiving technnological assistance from the US, Iraq employed further use of chemical bombs. This intensified as Iran consolidated its advantage in the war, and Iraq was accused of genocide of Kurds with its use of concentration camps and mass graves .
By mid-1989 over half of Iraqi Kurdistan had been cleared of Kurds. Yet, despite irrefutable evidence of crimes against humanity, the international community failed to react, with the industrialized nations continuing to back Baghdad against Tehran. They were also eyeing the $50,000 million worth of reconstruction projects Iraq put out to tender as the war ground to its conclusion. Britain doubled its export credit facility to Iraq, while the US and various European nations continued to supply sensitive arms and equipment.
Neither did things improve for the Kurds in Iran at the conclusion of the war in 1988, nor even with Khomeini's death the following year. Indeed, a number of top Kurdish politicians were assassinated during this period.
Saddam's invasion of Kuwait in 1990 brought about a whole new chapter in Kurdish history in Iraq. Encouraged by American president George Bush (Sr), the Kurds rose up in rebellion. Iraq responded with massacres and further use of chemical warfare. The US stayed out of it, reluctant to alarm its allies Turkey and Saudi Arabia by being seen to support Kurds or Shi'is.
Turkey initially denied access to Kurdish refugees from Iraq. Iran, on the other hand, opened its border.
The Coalition belatedly imposed a safe-haven for Kurds in the north of Iraq, and neither the subsequent skirmishes with Saddam's troops nor economic pressure could prevent Kurdish autonomous elections going ahead.
Barzani and Talabani, leaders of the two main political groups, were appointed joint leaders of the autonomous government. The latter, acting unilaterally, then invited Turkey to annex the oil-rich region of 4 million inhabitants. Ankara, fighting its own war with Kurdish (PKK) rebels, declined, although it later provided some economic aid.
Skirmishes broke out between Barzani's followers and those of Talabani in 1993, with Iranian involvement, and continued into 1994.
Meanwhile in Iran, the situation finally began to improve for Kurds with the election of Islamic reformer Mohammad Khatami in 1997, notwithstanding a brutal response to protests over the capture of Abdullah Ocalan a year later.
Ocalan was the leader of the Kurdish Workers Party (PKK), which had turned to terrorist activity in Turkey in the early 1980s. Turkey appears to be winning the battle with the PKK, but the struggle is costing the nation US$10 billion a year and adversely effecting its EU bid and tourism industry.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Kurdish people are ethnically and linguistically akin to Iranians. They number between 24 and 27 million worldwide, with about half in Turkey, a quarter in Iran and a sixth in Iraq - the majority living in the mountainous regions around the common border of these three nations, the ethnographic 'Kurdistan.' A further one million are in Syria, many of them having migrated down from Anatolia.
Three quarters of Kurds are Sunni Muslims. The remainder, mostly in central Anatolia, are Alevi, a branch of the Shi'ite faith with influences from the Zoroastrian and Turkic Shaman religions dating back 3,500 years. Many belong to Sufi mystic brotherhoods, another pre-Islamic tie.
Their languages form a branch of the Indo-European Farsi family, but differ from one another in some cases as much as English and German do. Turkic and Arabic influences are evident, and there are also many distinct 'Kurdish' words. Some Kurdish dialects have more in common with Farsi than they do with other Kurdish dialects.
The Kurds are considered to have originated in and around Iran. Waves of these Indo-European tribes began migrating westward in the Second Million BC. Indo-Europeans linguistically; ethnically, like most peoples of Southern Asia, a hybrid of Australoid (who originated in South East Asia) and Caucasoid (who originated in Southern Russia).
Kurdish tribes, in fact, were on the receiving end of attacks from Sumer (Iraq) over 4,000 years ago. But little is really known of their history until the advent of Islam in the seventh century. The ninth century found them fighting alongside the (doomed) Sassanians of Persia, and they were soon absorbed into the Islamic Empire.
They frequently rebelled against their Arab rulers however, and in 866 actually captured the city of Mosul. At the same time, Kurds remained prominent in the Arab campaigns against Christian Byzantium, Armenia and the Crusades. Though they often grated with the Turkmen alongside whom they fought, they produced similarly fine officers, notably the great Saladin al-Din of Tikrit (Northern Iraq). Saladin routed the Crusades in the 12th century and founded the Ayyubid Dynasty which spanned Egypt, Syria, Yemen, Iraq, Mecca and Diyarbakir (southern Turkey).
Saladin's rise coincided with the beginning of Arabic demise, and the Kurds now found themselves on the receiving end of Mongol and Turkish Seljuk raids, especially in Anatolia - where the entire population of Diyarbakir (Kurdistan's biggest city) was wiped out by one Mongol rampage.
Diyarbakir and other Kurdish settlements were sacked again by Tamerlane the Tartar in the 14th century, and there were further invasions in the 15th century. These edited highlights give a distorted overall picture, however. For the most part, Kurds were able to live a peaceful, pastoral existence.
A major turning point came early in the 16th century when the Ottoman Empire, approaching its zenith, defeated the Persian Safavids at the Battle of Chaldiran. Subsequent Alevi uprisings were put down by the Turks, in one instance leaving 40,000 dead. The Ottomans followed up with the capture of Tabriz.
This left Kurdistan as a virtual 'no-man's land' between the two empires. Henceforth, the Kurds were to come increasingly under the influence of the Turks. Many chose to defect to the Ottoman Empire of their own accord. Suleyman the Magnificent proceeded to take further Kurdish-occupied areas from the Persians, with 40,000 Kurdish fighters assisting in the capture of Baghdad in 1638. (On the other side of the border, the Kurdish Ardalan tribe were fighting for the Shah...).
The Baban Kurds, meanwhile, found themselves fighting on both sides in the Ottoman-Persian wars of the late eighteenth century. They were not mere tools of the empire, but proved well adept at playing the two off against each other.
At the beginning of the 19th century, Kurdistan itself had become the cause of conflict between the Sultan and the Shah. By then a new power had joined the fray; Russia with its designs on the Ottoman Empire, now in decline. Many Kurds joined the ranks of the Russians. Nomadic Kurdish bandits, meanwhile, had become the bane of Anatolia.
In the 1830s Mir Muhammad of Rawanduz ruthlessly hacked out a Kurdish Empire in Iraq and began to threaten Ottoman interests. The Turks, preoccupied with the Egyptian challenge on Syria, sought to appease him, even offering to make him Pasha of all Kurdistan. But Mir Muhammad marched right up the Tigris to the Anatolian frontier, at which point he was only forced to withdraw in order to quell a rebellion within his own domains. The Ottomans pursued him and he finally submitted in 1834, having been assured safe passage to Istanbul (he later disappeared without a trace).
The Egyptians, meanwhile, had routed the Ottomans, allowing the Kurdish tribe of Bader Khan of Buhtan to fill the void. After failing in his campaign against the Assyrians, he turned on the Nestorian Christians, committing two massacres. The initial Ottoman attack in response was repelled, but they returned two years later with a larger force and forced Bader Khan to surrender. He was exiled to the island of Crete.
The latter half of the century witnessed the rise of the Sufi Shaykhs within the Ottoman Empire. In 1880 Shaykh Ubaydallah of Nihri invaded Persia on behalf of the 'Kurdish Nation.' This began with a rebellion within Iran itself led by his son Abd al Qadir. The rebels advanced eastward with an army of 20,000, slaughtering 2,000 civilians at Miandoab and destroying some 2,000 villages along their way.
But before long most of the tribesmen in their ranks had returned to their homes, laden with booty, leaving a mere 1,500 to face the wrath of the Persian army, 12,000-strong. The Shaykh's remaining forces fled, many to be captured and killed. Ubaydallah was sent into exile and died in 1883.
The 19th century closed with the massacres of Armenian Christians throughout the Ottoman Empire, triggered by an aborted hostage-taking incident in Istanbul which had given Sultan Abd al Hamid a pretext to stoke fanaticism in order to secure his own status. The Hamidiya Cavalry, a regiment formed by the Sultan himself, were prominent among the Kurds who participated in the atrocities. Internationally the very word 'Kurd' had become synonymous with 'banditry.'
The Sultan's insistence on all-encompassing Ottoman nationality only strengthened the Kurdish quest for autonomy within the empire. In 1889 two Kurds were among the four founding members of the Committee for Union Progress (CUP), an organisation with similar objectives to the Young Turks.
The Kurdish duo were exiled to Tripoli in 1895 and escaped to Europe two years later. Abdallah Jadwat then wrote for Kurdistan, a European-based publication which also championed Armenian demands.
Meanwhile the Nihri, successors of Ubayd Allah, had formed an autonomous movement, also in exile, and a group of Kurdish youth instigated the Kurdish Hope Society, publishing the Rujd Kurd newspaper which enjoyed wide membership.
The Young Turk revolution in 1908, overthrowing Abd al Hamid, was cause for much celebration among the Kurdish community. Among other things, it brought an end to the age-old 'agha' system, which entailed village chiefs living as virtual princes within their domains, oppressing and exploiting their subjects at will.
However, some of the more extreme religious elements of Kurdish society, and withal the aghas themselves, were less pleased, and began to liaise with the Russians with a view to establishing an independent homeland for the Kurds in eastern Anatolia. The new Turkish government subsequently laid off the aghas, and a united Russian-Kurdish-Armenian front never did materialise.
During the First World War, Kurdistan became a battle ground. Russian-backed Armenians and Turkish-backed Kurds committed massacres against each another. Kurdish tribesmen were also enlisted to participate in the massacres of 1915, which some have termed the 'Armenian genocide.' Others, however, notably Alevi, offered shelter to the Armenian Christians.
The Kurds reward for assisting the Turkish army was, ironically, forced assimilation under the Young Turk government. This included a programme of dispersal, uprooting 700,000 Kurds from their villages, with as many as half of them perishing.
In all the depredations of war hit the Kurds particularly hard. Perhaps half a million died, many from cold and starvation, and this does not include the estimated 800,000 killed in battle.
The post-war Sykes-Picot Plot, a secret agreement between the governments of England and France (exposed by the Bolsheviks) involving the virtual partition of Turkey, threatened to leave Kurds scattered among a variety of European colonies. Kurdish designs on autonomy were therefore put on the backburner, as Islamic solidarity with the Turks became paramount.
The surprising Turkish victory led to the formation of the Turkish Republic within the borders we know today. The Kurds pushed their case at the Treaty of Luasanne (1923), but their pleas for autonomy fell on deaf ears.
Harsh reprisals followed a rebellion by Shaykh Said and his followers in 1924, including the repression of all forms of Kurdish nationalism. Between 1924 and 1938 all but one of the 18 military operations involving the Turkish army were carried out in Kurdistan. Kurdish sources claimed 200,000 died under 'deportation' from the region, with a further 15,000 villagers massacred.
In the late 20s the conflict moved to Mt Ararat, where the Kurds proclaimed a republic. This threatened to draw Turkey into war with Iran as the rebels sought refuge on the latter's side of the border. The Turks eventually drove the rebels off the mountain, with widespread executions in the aftermath.
Meanwhile in Iraq, Kurdish aims were scuppered by British, American and Turkish interest in the oil within the region. Sulaymaniya, in east Iraq, had gained a degree of self-rule under British rule. But their leader Shaykh Mahmud tried to seized full control and was sent into exile.
Pardoned and reinstated by the British in 1922, as a bulwark against the Turks, history repeated itself, as Mahmud again began to conspire against the colonial rulers. The British consequently bombed Sulaymaniya a number of times, forcing Mahmud to flee to the safety of the mountains. Riots followed in Sulaymaniya in 1930, leading to civilian deaths.
Indeed, at the signing of Iraqi independence in 1931, all promises to the Kurds in terms of political and cultural rights were forgotten. The League of Nations' acceptance of Iraq a year later was a further slap in the face of the Kurds.
The Barzan tribe, led by Shaykh Ahmad, proclaimed self-rule in 1932 and twice defeated the Iraqi forces. But the Iraqi's returned a third time, with the aid of British air support. The latter, using delayed action bombs in violation of the Hague Convention, caused widespread civilian carnage, and Ahmad was forced to surrender. His brothers continued the rebellion for another year, before surrendering under a generous amnesty.
A separate uprising on the part of the Khalil Khushawi Kurds, continued until 1936.
Back to Turkey where a Kurdish rebellion in the Anatolian province of Dersim had been quashed by aerial bombing in 1935. Casualties were estimated as high as 40,000 and comparisons were drawn to the treatment of Armenians two decades earlier. At that time Kurds accounted for 70% of East Anatolia's population.
In 1937 Turkey, Iraq and Iran signed a pact which reognised the established borders. No consideration was given to the Kurds.
In Iran as well there had been a series of post-World War I revolts, notably that of the Abdui Shikak. Backed by the Soviets, they remained the scourge of Iran until 1928, when the government betrayed and murdered their leader Simqu.
After the Second World War there was an uprising in Mahobad, also Soviet-backed. Following much turbulence, political scheming, inter-tribal conflict and warfare, this culminated in the formation of a tiny Kurdish Republic in 1945. Mahobad principal Qazi Muhammad, founder of the Kurdish Democratic Party of Iran, was declared president.
But when the Soviets withdrew from Iran just one year later, the republic was left vulnerable. Inevitably there were skirmishes, providing Tehran with a pretext to send in the troops. Qazi Muhammad and others, including his brother and his cousin, were publicly hanged.
Following the 1958 coup in Iraq by General Abd al Karim Qasim, a Kurdish rebellion broke out (Kurds actually fought on both sides, against Qasim and for him). When Qasim was on his way out, the Kurds allied themselves with the Baath Party, who overthrew him in 1963.
But the Kurds were betrayed in subsequent negotiations, with the oil-rich region of Kirkuk proving an insurmountable obstacle. The Iraq army imposed martial law in Sulaymaniya, with many deaths and disappearances resulting.
The Kurds had been weakened by a division within their own ranks. Mulla Mustafa's rebels had driven the Kurdish Democratic Party across the border into Iran. But he permitted them back again when war resumed with Baghdad in the mid-60s. Fifteen thousand Kurds held out against a hundred thousand Iraqis, before president Abdul Salam Arif's death in a plane crash brought a temporary pause to the conflict.
Arif's brother Abdul Rahman took over and resumed the war. But not even the use of napalm and chemical weapons by his airforce could bring him victory, and his army stumbled to defeat at the hands of the Kurdish Peshmergas, losing hundreds.
Iraq prime minister Abdul Rahman al-Bazzaz signed a treaty so generous to Kurdish interests, including a 'map to autonomy,' that he was driven out of office by Rahman and the army.
In the early 70s the Baaths, with a young Saddam Husayn prominent, again promised the Kurds autonomy, including full national rights, only for negotiations to again founder. The Baaths then attempted to assassinate Mulla Mustafa, sending human bombs.
Mustafa survived this and, emboldened by promises of US support, declined all Baath conditions, leading to outright war in the mid-70s. Iraq's army was twice the size of the Kurds', and backed up by tanks and aircraft. But Iran backed the Kurds with a view to overthrowing the Baaths. The ensuing stalemate led to a truce in March 1975. This signalled the end of Mustafa's involvement in the Kurdish struggle.
Meanwhile in Iran, the collapse of the Pahlavi regime in the late 70s, brought about a new push for Kurdish autonomy there. Tehran viewed this as 'secession,' all negotiations failed, and an estimated 10,000 deaths resulted from clashes during the first two years of the Khomeini reign.
A further 200 Kurds died in clashes with the Azaris when they attempted to stage a rally in Naqada in 1979.
The following year the Iranian army launched a major assault on Kurdish regions, subduing the locals, though at major cost to themselves.
At the outset of the Iran-Iraq War, Kurds seized lands within Iran. By 1983, however, Tehran had reclaimed it all and the rebels were driven across the border into Iraq.
As Iran gained the upper hand in the war with Iraq, Saddam Huseyn, unable to negotiate assistance from the Kurds, and fearful they would assist the enemy, executed 8,000 young men of the Barzani tribe. By 1986, Iraqi Kurds were fighting for Iran, and in 1987 they captured the Dukan Valley.
Further atrocities against Kurdish civilians ensued, including arbitrary executions and the razing of villages. Receiving technnological assistance from the US, Iraq employed further use of chemical bombs. This intensified as Iran consolidated its advantage in the war, and Iraq was accused of genocide of Kurds with its use of concentration camps and mass graves .
By mid-1989 over half of Iraqi Kurdistan had been cleared of Kurds. Yet, despite irrefutable evidence of crimes against humanity, the international community failed to react, with the industrialized nations continuing to back Baghdad against Tehran. They were also eyeing the $50,000 million worth of reconstruction projects Iraq put out to tender as the war ground to its conclusion. Britain doubled its export credit facility to Iraq, while the US and various European nations continued to supply sensitive arms and equipment.
Neither did things improve for the Kurds in Iran at the conclusion of the war in 1988, nor even with Khomeini's death the following year. Indeed, a number of top Kurdish politicians were assassinated during this period.
Saddam's invasion of Kuwait in 1990 brought about a whole new chapter in Kurdish history in Iraq. Encouraged by American president George Bush (Sr), the Kurds rose up in rebellion. Iraq responded with massacres and further use of chemical warfare. The US stayed out of it, reluctant to alarm its allies Turkey and Saudi Arabia by being seen to support Kurds or Shi'is.
Turkey initially denied access to Kurdish refugees from Iraq. Iran, on the other hand, opened its border.
The Coalition belatedly imposed a safe-haven for Kurds in the north of Iraq, and neither the subsequent skirmishes with Saddam's troops nor economic pressure could prevent Kurdish autonomous elections going ahead.
Barzani and Talabani, leaders of the two main political groups, were appointed joint leaders of the autonomous government. The latter, acting unilaterally, then invited Turkey to annex the oil-rich region of 4 million inhabitants. Ankara, fighting its own war with Kurdish (PKK) rebels, declined, although it later provided some economic aid.
Skirmishes broke out between Barzani's followers and those of Talabani in 1993, with Iranian involvement, and continued into 1994.
Meanwhile in Iran, the situation finally began to improve for Kurds with the election of Islamic reformer Mohammad Khatami in 1997, notwithstanding a brutal response to protests over the capture of Abdullah Ocalan a year later.
Ocalan was the leader of the Kurdish Workers Party (PKK), which had turned to terrorist activity in Turkey in the early 1980s. Turkey appears to be winning the battle with the PKK, but the struggle is costing the nation US$10 billion a year and adversely effecting its EU bid and tourism industry.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday, February 7, 2007
My take on the Iraq attack
I have lived in both America and Britain, among many countries, and the following is not intended as an indictment of the populace of either, least of all the individuals I encountered.
I retain a particular affection for my pals back in the States, whose generosity paved the way
for one of the major turning points of my life. I have, of course, met many fine English people.
What I am offering is my personal view on the behaviour of the current regimes of those
countries, and, to a lesser degree, certain cultural patterns and media trends which did not fail to disturb me.
The signs had always been there. But with the illegal and murderous invasion of Iraq in March 2003 America and Britain fully cast aside their sheep's clothing. Two nations, with histories steeped in genocide, slavery, land-theft, massacres and other such evils, had paraded as the good guys for two generations. Hitler drew them into World War II, then proceeded to let them off the hook with his ill-fated invasion ofthe Soviet Union.
The USSR, with an enormous sacrifice, did more than any other nation to turn the Third Reich around. Politcally alienated by the West, they received scant credit for it in the aftermath.
The Americans would claim the glory for themselves, as would the British. They would be perceived as the cowboys on white horses: the Americans, with an ideology
conducive to conformity, prejudice and hatred; the British, with their nationalism, falseness and hypocrisy.
They share, above all, a craving to be admired and a complete lack of regard for human life.
The invasion of Iraq was based on a deception. It has resulted in the deaths of scores of thousands, accompanied by atrocities, torture and cold-blooded murder.
The catastrophic results of the attack on Iraq were lucidly forseeable. Tens of millions
demonstrated beforehand all around the world. The masses were ignored by the handful in Washington and London.
Worst of all, the provision of adequate security measures for civilians was neglected by their so-called 'liberators.' The governments of America and Britain simply did not care.
For half a century many were fooled. Fear of communism was frequently trotted out as justification for similarly horrific crimes against humanity. But no such "threat" exists now. The ravenous wolves are there and plain to see. Neither America nor Britain has ever been the good guy.
Let that not stop the Bush regime, author of the greatest evil in recent history, condemning others which have actually harmed no one. What constitutes an Axis of Evil? The wholesale
slaughter of innocent civilians, or potential threat to American interests...?
In 1980 America and England boycotted the Olympics because the host nation was in the process of an illegal invasion. Now England wins the right to host the event - whilst participating in an illegal invasion. In the midst of this murderous invasion, they even attempted to discredit another city's bid because of racial chants at a football match.
The psychopathic killers pointing the finger at shoplifters.
What is the basis of American and British arrogance? Might makes Right? White makes Right, perhaps? Have we not progressed beyond the point where a handful of right-wingers can take it upon themselves to tell the rest of the world how to behave?
The international community needs to look elsewhere for leadership. America and Britain cannot be trusted and must not be followed.
End
I retain a particular affection for my pals back in the States, whose generosity paved the way
for one of the major turning points of my life. I have, of course, met many fine English people.
What I am offering is my personal view on the behaviour of the current regimes of those
countries, and, to a lesser degree, certain cultural patterns and media trends which did not fail to disturb me.
The signs had always been there. But with the illegal and murderous invasion of Iraq in March 2003 America and Britain fully cast aside their sheep's clothing. Two nations, with histories steeped in genocide, slavery, land-theft, massacres and other such evils, had paraded as the good guys for two generations. Hitler drew them into World War II, then proceeded to let them off the hook with his ill-fated invasion ofthe Soviet Union.
The USSR, with an enormous sacrifice, did more than any other nation to turn the Third Reich around. Politcally alienated by the West, they received scant credit for it in the aftermath.
The Americans would claim the glory for themselves, as would the British. They would be perceived as the cowboys on white horses: the Americans, with an ideology
conducive to conformity, prejudice and hatred; the British, with their nationalism, falseness and hypocrisy.
They share, above all, a craving to be admired and a complete lack of regard for human life.
The invasion of Iraq was based on a deception. It has resulted in the deaths of scores of thousands, accompanied by atrocities, torture and cold-blooded murder.
The catastrophic results of the attack on Iraq were lucidly forseeable. Tens of millions
demonstrated beforehand all around the world. The masses were ignored by the handful in Washington and London.
Worst of all, the provision of adequate security measures for civilians was neglected by their so-called 'liberators.' The governments of America and Britain simply did not care.
For half a century many were fooled. Fear of communism was frequently trotted out as justification for similarly horrific crimes against humanity. But no such "threat" exists now. The ravenous wolves are there and plain to see. Neither America nor Britain has ever been the good guy.
Let that not stop the Bush regime, author of the greatest evil in recent history, condemning others which have actually harmed no one. What constitutes an Axis of Evil? The wholesale
slaughter of innocent civilians, or potential threat to American interests...?
In 1980 America and England boycotted the Olympics because the host nation was in the process of an illegal invasion. Now England wins the right to host the event - whilst participating in an illegal invasion. In the midst of this murderous invasion, they even attempted to discredit another city's bid because of racial chants at a football match.
The psychopathic killers pointing the finger at shoplifters.
What is the basis of American and British arrogance? Might makes Right? White makes Right, perhaps? Have we not progressed beyond the point where a handful of right-wingers can take it upon themselves to tell the rest of the world how to behave?
The international community needs to look elsewhere for leadership. America and Britain cannot be trusted and must not be followed.
End
Saturday, February 3, 2007
Spanish history
A brief overview of the history of Spain
Spain was initially settled during the Neolithic period by Indo-Europeans from either the eastern Mediterannean or North Africa, and Celts and Basques from central and western Europe.
The earliest known civilization in Spain was that of Tartessos, at the mouth of the Guadalquivir River in Andalusia. The Tartessians spoke a language unrelated to any other.
They came into contact with Phoenician traders around 3000 years ago. The name Spain derives from the Phoenician word for a species of hare then prevalent on the peninsula.
It is thought the city of Tartessos was destroyed by Phoenicia's successor, Carthaginia, in the sixth century BC.
The Phoenicians were credited with the founding of Cadiz in south-west Spain in the 11th century BC.
Two centuries later the Greeks began setting up colonies in north-east Spain, such as Emporion near modern-day Girona and the river Ebro. The name of the river, derived from the Basque word for 'valley,' was to become the Greek name for the peninsula, 'Iberia.'
The Carthaginians settled in the south-east (notably Cartagena) and soon found themselves at war with the Greeks.
The Romans invaded in 218 BC, encountering not only the Carthaginians, but also fierce resistance from native Iberians, Celts and Lusitanians (the latter having arrived from France four centuries earlier).
The Second Punic War in which Rome defeated Carthage, and the Roman Civil War in which Julius Caesar vanquished Pompey, were both fought mostly on Spanish territory.
It would take the Romans two centuries to subdue the peninsula. This they did under Caesar Augustus, after whom the city of Zaragoza is named.
Five centuries of Roman occupation ensued, the 'Pax Romana,' during which Spain developed into a fully civilized, cosmopolitan, Latin-speaking society. Christianity was adopted in the first century.
With the collapse of the Roman Empire in the 5th century, the Visigoths took power, establishing Toledo as their capital and driving out their Germanic kinsmen, Vandals and Suevi, along with the Alans from Iran. However, the Suevi survived in the north-west (Galicia), while the Vandals and Alans settled in the south (the former giving their name to 'Vandalusia').
Latin language, law and culture remained strong throughout the Visigoth era, and the power of the church grew markedly, as it did elsewhere in Medievel Europe.
In 710 the last Visigoth king, Roderic, drove the Byzantines out of south-east Spain, only to be killed a year later at the onset of the Moorish invasions.
The Moors, primarily Berbers (indigenous north-west Africans) under Arab leadership, arrived in 711. The fragility of Visigoth rule was exposed as they surged on to reach the Pyrenees within eight years. Only the Basques held out.
During the reign of the Umayyads (previously based at Damascus, and whose empire extended as far as India), Cordoba was easily the most advanced city in Europe. From this Moorish capital vast innovations were introduced to the Christian world in terms of medicine, mathematics, astronomy and agriculture.
The Christian Reconquest actually began in the decade of the Moorish occupation, led by Pelayo, King of the Asturias. But it would require almost 800 years to complete. Toledo was taken in 1085 and Cordoba a century-and-a-half later. By the middle of the 13th century the Muslim territories had been reduced to Granada, a province which survived another 250 years as a vassal state of Christian Spain.
In 1492, the same year Columbus discovered America, the Christians drove the last of the Muslims out, resulting in the virtual reunification of Catholic Spain. The Moors were offered the choice of conversion or expulsion, as were the Jews, 200,000 of whom were expelled during the infamous Inquisition.
So it was that by the end of the 15th century Isabella and Ferdinand had recaptured the last vestiges of Muslim Spain, reunited much of the peninsula (for the first time since Roman rule), and gained a host of new colonies, notably, of course, the Americas with their lucrative silver mines.
The stage was set for the first truly global empire in world history. Its armies ruled the battlefields of Europe and the Americas, and its navy dominated the oceans. Francisco Pizzaro is credited with conquering the (divided) Inca Empire with an army of just 180 men.
At its height the Spanish Empire's territories encompassed South and Central America, parts of North America and East Asia, all of the Iberian peninsula, Germany, Holland and Belgium, southern Italy and Sicily.
This occured in the reign of Charles V (Carlos I), first Habsburg king of united Spain. He was the son of Philip I and Joanna the Mad and the grandson of Maximillian I.
Durng the reign of his successor Phillip II (who moved the capital from Toledo to Madrid in 1561), Spain joined Italy in a 'Holy' alliance which defeated the hitherto indomitable Ottomans in the sea Battle of Lepanto. The great Spanish writer Cervantes, himself wounded in action, described it as 'the end of Turkish invincibility.'
Phillip II sent the Spanish Armada against Elizabeth's England in 1588 to avenge English support for Dutch rebels in the Spanish Netherlands. The so-called 'Invincible Fleet' of 130 warships, firstly decimated by a storm, was routed by the British naval squadron under Francis Drake, with support from the Dutch.
This was not the turning point in history some (Protestant) historians would have us believe. However, the Bourbon dynasty had reversed many of the enlighened reforms introduced by Isabella and Ferdinand, and this was to sew the seeds of the empire's gradual decline..
Incessant warfare in Europe, the stifling domination of church and nobility, and economic problems (caused in no small part by the discovery of the Americas), saw the beginning of Spain's decline in the 17th century.
Portugal won its independence in 1640, Holland followed suit at the conclusion of the 80 Years War, and the 30 Years War between Europe's Protestants and Catholics resulted in the liberation of the German provinces.
The death of Charles II at the dawn of the 18th century led to the War of the Spanish Succession, waged primarily between the French Bourbons and the Austro-Hungarians, heirs of the Holy Roman Empire.
The latter, backed by England and Holland, gained the upper hand, forcing a truce in 1714 which saw the loss of further Spanish colonies, though the Bourbons remained on the throne.
The remainder of the century witnessed a steady recovery of the Spanish economy, with Bilbao and Barcelona in the north overhauling Cadiz in the south as the main centres of industry. Spain also prospered by supporting the American colonies in their victorious War of Independence against Britain.
Spain in the early 19th century alligned itself with Napoleon Bonaparte, brought to power by the French Revolution. Their combined naval forces were destroyed by a Britain fleet under Horatio Nelson at the Battle of Trafalgar near Gibraltar.
Charles IV was overthrown in the Mutiny of Aranjuez and replaced by his son Ferdinand VII. This displeased Napoleon, who forced both monarchs to renounce the throne, then placed his brother Joseph upon it.
This, in turn, triggered the Spanish War of Independence (Peninsula War), which began the same year with the nationalist uprising in Madrid. The Spanish were no match for Napoleon, but earned a reprieve with the emperor's ill-fated invasion of Russia. Wellington's Anglo-Portuguese army, combined with tenacious guerilla warfare on the part of the Spaniards themselves, finally ended French occupation in 1814. Ferdinand was returned to the throne.
The Napoleonic wars had major repercussions for Spain: economic distaster, the emergence of governmental rule more or less free of royal interference (a constitution was signed in Cadiz as early as 1812), and the loss of most of its remaining colonies in the Americas.
By 1825 only Cuba and Puerto Rico remained under Spanish rule. And these would be lost to the United States at the end of the century in the Spanish-American war. This war, believed to have been ignited by an accidental explosion which sunk the USS Maine, blamed on the Spanish, signalled the arrival of America as a major force in world affairs. They took Puerto Rico, the Phillipines and Guam from the Spanish, while Cuba gained independence, albeit under American restrictions.
Spain did gain some territories in north-west Africa early in the 20th century, but was checked in 1921 by the 'Disaster of Annual' during the Rif War in Morocco. Spanish forces were ambushed by Riffian warriors, losing as many as 20,000 men (to the enemy's 1000), including their general, Manuel Fernandez Silvestre. The remainder fled, leaving behind vital stocks of weaponry. The defeat ended the Spanish Protectorate in the region and triggered a political crisis in Madrid.
Left-right tensions continued into the 1930s with political assassinations rife. Under the Republican leadership of Manuel Azana, Spaniards enjoyed liberal democracy and both Catalan and Basque nationalists were able to flex their muscles. However, the government's land reforms ran into strong opposition from land-owners, leading to civil unrest, strikes and the formation of anarchist unions. The Republicans were also at loggerheads with the Military, the monarchists and the church, three pillars of traditional Spanish society. In 1932 there was a failed military coup.
Azana was returned to power in 1936 as head of a Republican-Socialist coalition, giving rise to the fascist Spanish Phalanx organization, the Nationalist party of Primo de Rivera. The Falangists murdered Jose Castillo of the anti-fascist movement, whose members shot dead right-wing leader Calvo Sotelo in retaliation.
Three days later an army uprising began in Spanish Morocco, led by General Francisco Franco, and spread into the Balaeric and Canary Islands. The Spanish Civil War had begun in earnest. While the majority of the population supported the government, the outcome would ultimately be decided by the military's support of the Nationalists, infighting between the Republicans and Socialists themselves, and foreign involvement.
The Nationalists were actively supported by Germany and Italy, the former bombing Guernica in the Basque Country (immortalized by the Pablo Picasso painting); the latter providing an air squadron and as many as 60,000 troops.The government's appeals to England and France fell on deaf ears, although arms were provided (at a heavy price) by the USSR, sympathetic to the socialist element.
In a bitterly-fought campaign the Fascists gained the upper hand, defending the Alcazar in Toledo and laying siege to Madrid, forcing the government to abandon the capital for Valencia.
The following year they took Bilbao and Santander, effectively sealing off the north, and Malaga in the south, although the Republicans fought back to hold Madrid and recapture nearby Segovia.
In February 1938 Franco emerged victorious at the pivotal battle of Teruel, thus reaching the Mediterranean and dissecting the enemy-held portion of Spain. The government was forced to move again, this time to Barcelona, but by the end of the year the Nationalists were invading Catalonia. The region fell in January 1939, and Madrid and Valencia soon followed, forcing the Republicans' surrender.
Franco showed no mercy. As many as 28,000 leftists were executed and thousands more imprisoned for life. The dictator was to rule with an iron fist until his death in 1975.
The first half of his regin was marked by economic depression owing to political isolation. Transformation began in 1953 when a military alliance with Eisenhower resulted in financial aid from the US and admission to the UN two years later.
During the 1960s Spain began to tap into its huge potential for tourism. The impact was no less signficant on the national psyche. In what became known as the 'Swedish Revolution,' consersative Catholic values began to give way to more liberal attitudes as northern Europeans invaded the Mediterranean Coast. The 'Spanish Miracle' was underway.
Two years before his death Franco stepped down as prime minister, though remaining head of state and commander of the military. His intended successor, the like-minded Luis Carrero Blanco, was blown up in his car by an ETA bomb planted beneath the road. The Basque terrorist organization had been increasingly active since the 1960s, and would continue its attacks in the post-Franco era.
The dictator named Prince Carlos the Bourbon his successor as head of state, ignoring the rightful claim of his father and king-in-exile, Don Juan. After Franco's death Carlos would delight the majority of Spaniards by pushing through democratic reforms and instigating the development of a capitalist society.
The first elections of the post-Franco era in 1977 were won by a Democratic coalition under Adolfo Suarez, who had previously run the government of Carlos. The Basque and Catalonian nationalist parties also fared well.
A group of officers from the Guardia Civil (a military organization which had evolved into a police force in the time of Franco) attempted a military coup in 1981, holding congress at gunpoint and rolling tanks into Valencia. Carlos further endeared himself to his subjects at this time with his televised 'Over my Dead Body' speech. The coup failed.
In 1982, the year Spain hosted football's World Cup, the Socialist party came to power and laid the groundwork for Spain's inclusion in the EU, which came about four years later. In 1992 Barcelona hosted the Olympic Games.
Spain began the 21st century as one of the world's most liberal societies, with its relaxed way of life and a peace-loving population enjoying a high standard of living due in no small part to the 60 million tourists it receives each year.
Spain was initially settled during the Neolithic period by Indo-Europeans from either the eastern Mediterannean or North Africa, and Celts and Basques from central and western Europe.
The earliest known civilization in Spain was that of Tartessos, at the mouth of the Guadalquivir River in Andalusia. The Tartessians spoke a language unrelated to any other.
They came into contact with Phoenician traders around 3000 years ago. The name Spain derives from the Phoenician word for a species of hare then prevalent on the peninsula.
It is thought the city of Tartessos was destroyed by Phoenicia's successor, Carthaginia, in the sixth century BC.
The Phoenicians were credited with the founding of Cadiz in south-west Spain in the 11th century BC.
Two centuries later the Greeks began setting up colonies in north-east Spain, such as Emporion near modern-day Girona and the river Ebro. The name of the river, derived from the Basque word for 'valley,' was to become the Greek name for the peninsula, 'Iberia.'
The Carthaginians settled in the south-east (notably Cartagena) and soon found themselves at war with the Greeks.
The Romans invaded in 218 BC, encountering not only the Carthaginians, but also fierce resistance from native Iberians, Celts and Lusitanians (the latter having arrived from France four centuries earlier).
The Second Punic War in which Rome defeated Carthage, and the Roman Civil War in which Julius Caesar vanquished Pompey, were both fought mostly on Spanish territory.
It would take the Romans two centuries to subdue the peninsula. This they did under Caesar Augustus, after whom the city of Zaragoza is named.
Five centuries of Roman occupation ensued, the 'Pax Romana,' during which Spain developed into a fully civilized, cosmopolitan, Latin-speaking society. Christianity was adopted in the first century.
With the collapse of the Roman Empire in the 5th century, the Visigoths took power, establishing Toledo as their capital and driving out their Germanic kinsmen, Vandals and Suevi, along with the Alans from Iran. However, the Suevi survived in the north-west (Galicia), while the Vandals and Alans settled in the south (the former giving their name to 'Vandalusia').
Latin language, law and culture remained strong throughout the Visigoth era, and the power of the church grew markedly, as it did elsewhere in Medievel Europe.
In 710 the last Visigoth king, Roderic, drove the Byzantines out of south-east Spain, only to be killed a year later at the onset of the Moorish invasions.
The Moors, primarily Berbers (indigenous north-west Africans) under Arab leadership, arrived in 711. The fragility of Visigoth rule was exposed as they surged on to reach the Pyrenees within eight years. Only the Basques held out.
During the reign of the Umayyads (previously based at Damascus, and whose empire extended as far as India), Cordoba was easily the most advanced city in Europe. From this Moorish capital vast innovations were introduced to the Christian world in terms of medicine, mathematics, astronomy and agriculture.
The Christian Reconquest actually began in the decade of the Moorish occupation, led by Pelayo, King of the Asturias. But it would require almost 800 years to complete. Toledo was taken in 1085 and Cordoba a century-and-a-half later. By the middle of the 13th century the Muslim territories had been reduced to Granada, a province which survived another 250 years as a vassal state of Christian Spain.
In 1492, the same year Columbus discovered America, the Christians drove the last of the Muslims out, resulting in the virtual reunification of Catholic Spain. The Moors were offered the choice of conversion or expulsion, as were the Jews, 200,000 of whom were expelled during the infamous Inquisition.
So it was that by the end of the 15th century Isabella and Ferdinand had recaptured the last vestiges of Muslim Spain, reunited much of the peninsula (for the first time since Roman rule), and gained a host of new colonies, notably, of course, the Americas with their lucrative silver mines.
The stage was set for the first truly global empire in world history. Its armies ruled the battlefields of Europe and the Americas, and its navy dominated the oceans. Francisco Pizzaro is credited with conquering the (divided) Inca Empire with an army of just 180 men.
At its height the Spanish Empire's territories encompassed South and Central America, parts of North America and East Asia, all of the Iberian peninsula, Germany, Holland and Belgium, southern Italy and Sicily.
This occured in the reign of Charles V (Carlos I), first Habsburg king of united Spain. He was the son of Philip I and Joanna the Mad and the grandson of Maximillian I.
Durng the reign of his successor Phillip II (who moved the capital from Toledo to Madrid in 1561), Spain joined Italy in a 'Holy' alliance which defeated the hitherto indomitable Ottomans in the sea Battle of Lepanto. The great Spanish writer Cervantes, himself wounded in action, described it as 'the end of Turkish invincibility.'
Phillip II sent the Spanish Armada against Elizabeth's England in 1588 to avenge English support for Dutch rebels in the Spanish Netherlands. The so-called 'Invincible Fleet' of 130 warships, firstly decimated by a storm, was routed by the British naval squadron under Francis Drake, with support from the Dutch.
This was not the turning point in history some (Protestant) historians would have us believe. However, the Bourbon dynasty had reversed many of the enlighened reforms introduced by Isabella and Ferdinand, and this was to sew the seeds of the empire's gradual decline..
Incessant warfare in Europe, the stifling domination of church and nobility, and economic problems (caused in no small part by the discovery of the Americas), saw the beginning of Spain's decline in the 17th century.
Portugal won its independence in 1640, Holland followed suit at the conclusion of the 80 Years War, and the 30 Years War between Europe's Protestants and Catholics resulted in the liberation of the German provinces.
The death of Charles II at the dawn of the 18th century led to the War of the Spanish Succession, waged primarily between the French Bourbons and the Austro-Hungarians, heirs of the Holy Roman Empire.
The latter, backed by England and Holland, gained the upper hand, forcing a truce in 1714 which saw the loss of further Spanish colonies, though the Bourbons remained on the throne.
The remainder of the century witnessed a steady recovery of the Spanish economy, with Bilbao and Barcelona in the north overhauling Cadiz in the south as the main centres of industry. Spain also prospered by supporting the American colonies in their victorious War of Independence against Britain.
Spain in the early 19th century alligned itself with Napoleon Bonaparte, brought to power by the French Revolution. Their combined naval forces were destroyed by a Britain fleet under Horatio Nelson at the Battle of Trafalgar near Gibraltar.
Charles IV was overthrown in the Mutiny of Aranjuez and replaced by his son Ferdinand VII. This displeased Napoleon, who forced both monarchs to renounce the throne, then placed his brother Joseph upon it.
This, in turn, triggered the Spanish War of Independence (Peninsula War), which began the same year with the nationalist uprising in Madrid. The Spanish were no match for Napoleon, but earned a reprieve with the emperor's ill-fated invasion of Russia. Wellington's Anglo-Portuguese army, combined with tenacious guerilla warfare on the part of the Spaniards themselves, finally ended French occupation in 1814. Ferdinand was returned to the throne.
The Napoleonic wars had major repercussions for Spain: economic distaster, the emergence of governmental rule more or less free of royal interference (a constitution was signed in Cadiz as early as 1812), and the loss of most of its remaining colonies in the Americas.
By 1825 only Cuba and Puerto Rico remained under Spanish rule. And these would be lost to the United States at the end of the century in the Spanish-American war. This war, believed to have been ignited by an accidental explosion which sunk the USS Maine, blamed on the Spanish, signalled the arrival of America as a major force in world affairs. They took Puerto Rico, the Phillipines and Guam from the Spanish, while Cuba gained independence, albeit under American restrictions.
Spain did gain some territories in north-west Africa early in the 20th century, but was checked in 1921 by the 'Disaster of Annual' during the Rif War in Morocco. Spanish forces were ambushed by Riffian warriors, losing as many as 20,000 men (to the enemy's 1000), including their general, Manuel Fernandez Silvestre. The remainder fled, leaving behind vital stocks of weaponry. The defeat ended the Spanish Protectorate in the region and triggered a political crisis in Madrid.
Left-right tensions continued into the 1930s with political assassinations rife. Under the Republican leadership of Manuel Azana, Spaniards enjoyed liberal democracy and both Catalan and Basque nationalists were able to flex their muscles. However, the government's land reforms ran into strong opposition from land-owners, leading to civil unrest, strikes and the formation of anarchist unions. The Republicans were also at loggerheads with the Military, the monarchists and the church, three pillars of traditional Spanish society. In 1932 there was a failed military coup.
Azana was returned to power in 1936 as head of a Republican-Socialist coalition, giving rise to the fascist Spanish Phalanx organization, the Nationalist party of Primo de Rivera. The Falangists murdered Jose Castillo of the anti-fascist movement, whose members shot dead right-wing leader Calvo Sotelo in retaliation.
Three days later an army uprising began in Spanish Morocco, led by General Francisco Franco, and spread into the Balaeric and Canary Islands. The Spanish Civil War had begun in earnest. While the majority of the population supported the government, the outcome would ultimately be decided by the military's support of the Nationalists, infighting between the Republicans and Socialists themselves, and foreign involvement.
The Nationalists were actively supported by Germany and Italy, the former bombing Guernica in the Basque Country (immortalized by the Pablo Picasso painting); the latter providing an air squadron and as many as 60,000 troops.The government's appeals to England and France fell on deaf ears, although arms were provided (at a heavy price) by the USSR, sympathetic to the socialist element.
In a bitterly-fought campaign the Fascists gained the upper hand, defending the Alcazar in Toledo and laying siege to Madrid, forcing the government to abandon the capital for Valencia.
The following year they took Bilbao and Santander, effectively sealing off the north, and Malaga in the south, although the Republicans fought back to hold Madrid and recapture nearby Segovia.
In February 1938 Franco emerged victorious at the pivotal battle of Teruel, thus reaching the Mediterranean and dissecting the enemy-held portion of Spain. The government was forced to move again, this time to Barcelona, but by the end of the year the Nationalists were invading Catalonia. The region fell in January 1939, and Madrid and Valencia soon followed, forcing the Republicans' surrender.
Franco showed no mercy. As many as 28,000 leftists were executed and thousands more imprisoned for life. The dictator was to rule with an iron fist until his death in 1975.
The first half of his regin was marked by economic depression owing to political isolation. Transformation began in 1953 when a military alliance with Eisenhower resulted in financial aid from the US and admission to the UN two years later.
During the 1960s Spain began to tap into its huge potential for tourism. The impact was no less signficant on the national psyche. In what became known as the 'Swedish Revolution,' consersative Catholic values began to give way to more liberal attitudes as northern Europeans invaded the Mediterranean Coast. The 'Spanish Miracle' was underway.
Two years before his death Franco stepped down as prime minister, though remaining head of state and commander of the military. His intended successor, the like-minded Luis Carrero Blanco, was blown up in his car by an ETA bomb planted beneath the road. The Basque terrorist organization had been increasingly active since the 1960s, and would continue its attacks in the post-Franco era.
The dictator named Prince Carlos the Bourbon his successor as head of state, ignoring the rightful claim of his father and king-in-exile, Don Juan. After Franco's death Carlos would delight the majority of Spaniards by pushing through democratic reforms and instigating the development of a capitalist society.
The first elections of the post-Franco era in 1977 were won by a Democratic coalition under Adolfo Suarez, who had previously run the government of Carlos. The Basque and Catalonian nationalist parties also fared well.
A group of officers from the Guardia Civil (a military organization which had evolved into a police force in the time of Franco) attempted a military coup in 1981, holding congress at gunpoint and rolling tanks into Valencia. Carlos further endeared himself to his subjects at this time with his televised 'Over my Dead Body' speech. The coup failed.
In 1982, the year Spain hosted football's World Cup, the Socialist party came to power and laid the groundwork for Spain's inclusion in the EU, which came about four years later. In 1992 Barcelona hosted the Olympic Games.
Spain began the 21st century as one of the world's most liberal societies, with its relaxed way of life and a peace-loving population enjoying a high standard of living due in no small part to the 60 million tourists it receives each year.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)